Clinical Research Trials
Double Blind Placebo Control Study
Welcome to Clinical Research Trials - There are some other techniques for medical research that can be
employed besides the therapeutic trials. These include double blind and single
blind techniques, placebo control, parallel groups. We can further evaluate
pharmacoepidemiological aspects as The Observational Cohort Study and Case
Control Study along with Record linkage by computers.
The Measurable Difference By
Clinical Research Trials:
Definitive Therapeutic trials are
expensive, tedious and time consuming. Sometimes when the result comes, that can
even be useless or vague in nature. Again the single trial will seldom give a
conclusive answer to a therapeutic question. Confirmatory trials by other
persons in other centers are needed to reach reasonable certainty.
Meta Analysis Of Clinical Research
Trials:
When numerous trials have been done and results vary, it is necessary to do
meta- or overall analysis. Simply an addition of results won't solve the
dilemma. However it should be remembered that the selected trials should be of
high value.
Double Blind & Single Blind
Techniques In Clinical Research Trials:
W. Modell in JAMA
(1958; 167: 2190) describes the double blind technique, "This is a control
device to prevent bias from influencing results. On the one hand it rules out
the effects of hopes and anxieties of the patient by giving both the drug under
investigation and a placebo or dummy of identical appearance in such a way that
the subject (the first blind man) does not know which he is receiving. On the
other hand, it also rules out the influence of preconceived hopes of, and
unconscious communication by, the investigator or observer by keeping him (the
second blind) ignorant of whether he is prescribing a placebo or an active drug.
At the same time the technique provides another control, a means of comparison
with the magnitude of placebo effects. This device is both philosophically and
practically sound."
A non-blind
clinical research trial
is called an 'open trial'.
The double blind
technique should be used when evaluation depends on other than strictly
objective measurements. Like the pain in Rheumatoid arthritis may look as
objective but closer look may prove it to be subjective.
Sometimes the
double blind technique is not possible like the side effects of an active drug
reveal which patient is taking the active drug.
Placebo Medication As A Control In
Clinical Research Trials:
Dummy or Placebo treatment is used with double blind technique.
Its use is not invariably necessary nor indeed ethical. It is not permissible to
deprive patients of effective therapy. But it is often preferable to discontinue
the use of unproven efficacy or safety. Frequently, consent may be obtained to
the use of placebo without impairing the scientific validity of the procedure.
The Use Of Placebo In Clinical
Research Trials:
-
Placebo helps in
identifying the beneficial effects of a drug from the psychological effects of
taking the medicine and the surrounding circumstances like increase interest by
the doctor, more frequent visits etc.
-
It establishes the
drug effects from fluctuations in disease that occur with time and other
external factors when the active treatment is witheld.
-
It helps to avoid
false negative conclusions.
Parallel Groups:
Within Patient Group Parallel
Study:
In Chronic stable
diseases with no cure but with alleviation of symptoms alone, each of the
treatment including placebo is given to each patient. In this way we use them as
their own controls. It is important to ensure in a small series that each drug
both precedes and follows each other drug the same number of times to avoid the
risk of carry over effect. This study has some drawbacks like presence of a drug
or metabolite and enzyme induction.
So Between Patient
Group parallel studies are preferred. And they require large number of patients.
Further in acute
self-limiting diseases, it is impossible to give more than one treatment to one
patient. So the controls should be other patients.
The Historic
Controls In Clinical Research Trials:
When the
treatment is given to all patients of present group and it is compared with the
past studies is called the historical controls. It is unacceptable for standards
of treatment and diagnosis change, severity of diseases fluctuates.
The following
table is taken from 'Measurements in Rheumatoid Arthritis' by Hart F. D. et al
1972.
|
Common Troubles
of Clinical Assessment |
|
Enthusiasm and
Scepticism - excellent, marvelous, useless |
Pride
|
|
Change of
Assessor - Do the measurements for me |
Impurity -
short of cases |
|
Change of Time
|
Imbalance -
sex, severity or treatment order doesn't matter |
|
Squeezing - You
are much better now. How are you? |
Error - Not
significant |
Pharmacoepidemiology
in Clinical Research Trials:
Three epidemiological approaches are used
to determine the results of controlled therapeutic trials for performance of the
treatment in community medicine. These are observational in nature in place of
experimental.
The Observational
Cohort Study:
In this forward looking or prospective
study, all the patients taking the drug are collected and followed up to
determine the outcomes - both therapeutic and adverse. Prescription event
monitoring is an example where patients are observed after writing the
prescription. The major trouble with this study is selection of an appropriate
control group, the need for large number of patients, and prolonged
surveillance.
The Case Control
Study:
In this backward looking or retrospective
investigation, the investigator assembles a group of patients who have the
desired condition. Then a control group of patients who have not had an episode
of the particular condition is assembled like from similar age, parity, smoking
habits from hospital admissions, primary case records. Both groups are followed
retrospectively.
The Observational method is
cumbersome, expensive and can't satisfy the urgent need for an answer after a
doubt is raised. A case control study is done quickly with smaller number of
patients. The disadvantages of case control study are the possibility of
suspicion of intrusion of unknown and unavoidable biases in selection of
patients and controls. Further it requires a definite suspicion of causality. So
these don't prove causality. They reveal only associations.
Clinical Research
Trials & Record Linkage By Computers:
This allows correlation of Clinical Research
trials in a population of life
and health events with history of drug use. It is being developed as far as
resources permit.
Reliability Of
Published Clinical Research Trials:
In one published
study it was reported that about 66% of published papers are acceptable and 33%
unacceptable according to what are now generally agreed criteria.
BACK TO TOP
The Preclinical or Animal
Research
studies - discovery to development of medicine - Its role in Herbal Research.
The Therapeutic trials in Man - Its role in Clinical research trials of Herbal Research.
How the
Therapeutic Clinical Research trials are designed and What are the ethics of research in man? How
are they sized appropriately?
What is double blind
clinical research trials? Why are they necessary?
BACK TO HERBAL
RESEARCH
HOME I
CONTACT US
I
HEALTH ARTICLES
I
JOIN
NEWSLETTER
BACK TO TOP
|